4.1
In accordance with Updated EM&A Manual, construction
noise monitoring was conducted in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous
sound pressure level (Leq) to monitor the
construction noise arising from the construction activities. The regular
monitoring frequency for each monitoring station shall be on a weekly basis and
conduct one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays.
Appendix B shows the established
Action and Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.
4.2
Impact noise monitoring was conducted at the
monitoring stations, as shown in Figure 3
and 4 according to Table 1.1 of
Updated EM&A Manual. Table 4.1 describes the locations of
the noise monitoring stations.
Table 4.1 Location
of Noise Monitoring Stations
Contract No. |
Monitoring Station(s) |
Location(s) |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
Belair Monte |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[2] |
Scattered Village Houses in Tong Hang |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS2[3] |
Residential Buildings at Ma Tso Lung |
CP-KTN-NMS3[4] |
Fung Kong Garden |
|
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS5 |
N/A |
Remark:
[1]: Noting that construction
phase noise monitoring at the other proposed monitoring stations (e.g.
planned), where access is permitted, will be conducted during the relevant
works contract(s).
[2]: Since the distance
between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A
exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
[3],[4]:
Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03
under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to
ND/2019/03.
4.3
Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for impact
noise monitoring. The meters are Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a
continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous
sound pressure level (Leq) and percentile sound
pressure level (Lx) that also complied with International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications.
Table 4.2 summarizes the noise
monitoring equipment being used. Copies of calibration certificates are
attached in Appendix C.
Table 4.2 Noise Monitoring
Equipment
Equipment |
Manufacturer |
Model |
Quantity |
¡¥SVANTEK¡¦ Integrating Sound Level Meter |
SVANTEK |
SVAN 955 |
1 |
SVAN 977 |
1 |
||
Sound & Vibration Analyser |
BSWA |
BSWA 801 |
2 |
Sound Level Meter |
BSWA |
BSWA 308 |
2 |
Acoustical
Calibrator |
Brüel & Kjær |
4231 |
1 |
SVANTEK |
SV30A |
2 |
4.4
Table
4.3 summarises the monitoring parameters, frequency and total
duration of monitoring. The noise
monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix
D.
Table 4.3 Noise Monitoring
Parameters, Duration and Frequency
Contract No. |
Monitoring Stations |
Parameter |
Duration |
Frequency |
Measurement |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
L10(30 min.) dB(A) L90(30 min.) dB(A) Leq(30 min.)dB(A) (as six consecutive Leq, 5min
readings) |
0700-1900 hrs on normal weekdays |
Once
per week |
Façade |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[3] |
||||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS2[4] |
Free-field[1] |
|||
CP-KTN NMS3[5] |
|||||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS5 |
Remarks:
[1]: Correction of
+3dB (A) for Free-field Measurement.
[2]:
A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq).
It is the constant noise level which, under a given situation and time period,
contains the same acoustic energy as the actual time-varying noise level.
L10 is
the level exceeded for 10% of the time. For 10% of the time, the sound or noise
has a sound pressure level above L10.
L90 is
the level exceeded for 90% of the time. For 90% of the time, the noise level is
above this level.
[3]: Since the
distance between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under
EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to
ND/2019/03.
[4],[5]: Since the distance between monitoring station and site
boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station
is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
¡P
The microphone head of the sound level meter
was positioned at 1m from the exterior of the noise sensitive facade and
lowered sufficiently so that the building¡¦s external wall acted as a reflecting surface;
¡P
The battery
condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter;
¡P
Parameters
such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were
set as follows:
¡X
frequency weighting : A
¡X
time weighting : Fast
¡X
time measurement :
Leq(30 min.) dB(A)
(as six consecutive Leq, 5min readings)
during non-restricted hours (i.e. 0700-1900 hrs on
normal weekdays)
¡P
Prior to and
after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for
94.0 dB at 1000 Hz. If the
difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than
1.0 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise
measurement would be required after re- calibration or repair of the equipment;
¡P
During the monitoring period, the Leq, L90 and L10 were recorded. In
addition, site conditions and
noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet;
¡P
Noise
measurement was paused temporarily during periods of high intrusive noise (e.g.
dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible and observation record during
measurement period should be provided; and
¡P
Noise
monitoring was cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady
speed exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. The wind speed should
be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed
in m/s.
4.5
The microphone head of the sound level meter
and calibrator were cleaned with a soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
4.6
The sound level meter and calibrator were
checked and calibrated at yearly intervals.
4.7
Immediately prior to and following each noise
measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter should be checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. Measurements would be accepted as valid only if the calibration
levels before and after the noise measurement agreed to within 1.0 dB.
4.8
The noise monitoring results are summarised in Table 4.4.
Detailed monitoring results and graphical presentations of noise monitoring are
shown in Appendix F. The weather
information for the reporting month is summarized in Appendix I.
Table 4.4 Summary
Table of Noise Monitoring Results during the Reporting Month
Contract No. |
Monitoring Station |
Noise Level Leq (30 min), dB(A) |
Baseline
Level, dB(A) |
Limit Level,
dB(A) |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
66.1-68.6 |
69.9 |
75 |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[1] |
55.7-62.3 |
59.6 |
|
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS2[2] |
54.1-57.7 |
58.6 |
|
CP-KTN NMS3[3] |
52.0-62.2 |
51.6 |
||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS5 |
51.5-58.8 |
57.2 |
Remarks:
[1]: Since the distance
between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A
exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
[2],[3]:
Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03
under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to
ND/2019/03.
4.9
All noise monitoring was conducted as
scheduled in the reporting month. No complaint was received during the reporting.
No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded. The summary of exceedance
record in reporting month is shown in Appendix
K.
4.10
According to our field observations, the
major noise source identified at the designated noise monitoring stations in
the reporting month are as follows:
Table 4.5 Observation
at Noise Monitoring Stations
Contract No. |
Monitoring Station |
Location |
Major Noise Source |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
Belair Monte (Existing) |
Road Traffic at Ma Sik Road |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[1] |
Scattered Village
House in Tong Hang (Existing) |
Road Traffic near Tong Hang |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS2[2] |
Residential
Buildings at Ma Tso Lung (Existing) |
Road Traffic near Ma Tso Lung |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS3[3] |
Fung Kong Garden
(Existing) |
Road Traffic near Fung Kong Garden |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS5 |
N/A |
Other construction site |
Remarks:
[1]: Since the distance
between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A
exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
[2],[3]:
Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03
under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to
ND/2019/03.
4.11
Should any project related non-compliance of
the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Action Plan in Appendix J shall be carried out.