4.1
In
accordance with Updated EM&A Manual, construction noise monitoring was
conducted in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq) to monitor the construction noise arising from
the construction activities. The regular monitoring frequency for each
monitoring station shall be on a weekly basis and conduct one set of
measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. Appendix B shows the established Action
and Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.
4.2
Impact
noise monitoring was conducted at the monitoring stations, as shown in Figure 3 and 4 according to Table 1.1 of Updated EM&A Manual. Table
4.1 describes the locations of the noise monitoring stations.
Table
4.1 Location
of Noise Monitoring Stations
Contract
No. |
Monitoring Station(s) |
Location(s) |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1[2] |
Belair Monte |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[3] |
Scattered Village Houses in Tong Hang |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS2[4] |
Residential Buildings at Ma Tso Lung |
CP-KTN-NMS3[5] |
Fung Kong Garden |
|
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS5 |
N/A |
ND/2019/02 |
CP-KTN-NMS6 |
Ho Sheung Heung, Hau
Ku Shek Ancestral Hall, Hung Shing
Temple & Pai Fung Temple and Sin Wai Nunnery |
Remarks:
[1]: Noting that construction phase noise monitoring at the other proposed
monitoring stations (e.g. planned), where access is permitted, will be
conducted during the relevant works contract(s).
[2]: Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of
ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not
applicable to ND/2019/03.
[3]: Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of
ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not
applicable to ND/2019/03.
[4],[5]: Since the distance between monitoring
station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The
monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
4.3
Integrating
Sound Level Meter was used for impact noise monitoring. The meters are Type 1
sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level
readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx) that also
complied with International Electrotechnical
Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications.
Table 4.2 summarizes the noise
monitoring equipment being used. Copies of calibration certificates are
attached in Appendix C.
Table
4.2 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Manufacturer |
Model |
Quantity |
Sound & Vibration Analyser |
BSWA |
BSWA 801 |
1 |
Sound Level Meter |
BSWA |
BSWA 308 |
2 |
Acoustical Calibrator |
SVANTEK |
SV30A |
2 |
4.4
Table 4.3 summarises
the monitoring parameters, frequency and total duration of monitoring. The noise monitoring schedule is shown
in Appendix D.
Table 4.3 Noise
Monitoring Parameters, Duration and Frequency
Contract No. |
Monitoring
Stations |
Parameter |
Duration |
Frequency |
Measurement |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
L10(30 min.) dB(A) L90(30 min.) dB(A) Leq(30 min.)dB(A) (as six consecutive Leq, 5min
readings) |
0700-1900
hrs on normal
weekdays |
Once per week |
Façade |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[3] |
||||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN
NMS2[4] |
Free-field[1] |
|||
CP-KTN
NMS3[5] |
|||||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN
NMS5 |
||||
ND/2019/02 |
CP-KTN-NMS6 |
Façade |
Remarks:
[1]: Correction of +3dB (A) for Free-field Measurement.
[2]: A-weighted equivalent
continuous sound pressure level (Leq). It
is the constant noise level which, under a given situation and time period,
contains the same acoustic energy as the actual time-varying noise level.
L10 is the level
exceeded for 10% of the time. For 10% of the time, the sound or noise has a
sound pressure level above L10.
L90 is the level
exceeded for 90% of the time. For 90% of the time, the noise level is above
this level.
[3]: Since the distance between monitoring station
and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The
monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
[4],[5]: Since the
distance between monitoring station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under
EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not applicable to
ND/2019/03.
¡P
The
microphone head of the sound level meter was positioned at 1m from the exterior
of the noise sensitive I and lowered sufficiently so that the building¡¦s
external wall acted as a reflecting surface;
¡P
The battery
condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter;
¡P
Parameters such
as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
¡X
frequency weighting : A
¡X
time weighting : Fast
¡X
time measurement :
Leq(30 min.) dB(A)
(as six consecutive Leq,
5min readings)
during non-restricted hours (i.e. 0700-1900 hrs on
normal weekdays)
¡P
Prior to and
after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for
94.0 dB at 1000 Hz. If the
difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than
1.0 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise
measurement would be required after re- calibration or repair of the equipment;
¡P
During the monitoring period, the Leq, L90
and L10 were recorded. In addition,
site conditions and noise sources were recorded
on a standard record sheet;
¡P
Noise
measurement was paused temporarily during periods of high intrusive noise (e.g.
dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible and observation record during
measurement period should be provided; and
¡P
Noise monitoring
was cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. The wind speed should be
checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in m/s.
4.5
The
microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator were cleaned with a
soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
4.6
The
sound level meter and calibrator were checked and calibrated at yearly
intervals.
4.7
Immediately
prior to and following each noise measurement, the accuracy of the sound level
meter should be checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound
pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements would be accepted as valid
only if the calibration levels before and after the noise measurement agreed to
within 1.0 dB.
4.8
The
noise monitoring results are summarized in Table
4.4. Detailed monitoring results and graphical presentations of noise
monitoring are shown in Appendix F.
The weather information for the reporting month is summarized in Appendix I.
Table 4.4 Summary Table of Noise
Monitoring Results during the Reporting Month
Contract No. |
Monitoring Station |
Noise Level Leq (30 min), dB(A) |
Baseline Level, dB(A) |
Limit Level, dB(A) |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
66.3-73.5 |
69.9 |
75 |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[1] |
54.1-59.2 |
59.6 |
|
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS2[2] |
56.5-63.3 |
58.6 |
|
CP-KTN NMS3[3] |
48.4-58.4 |
51.6 |
||
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN NMS5 |
49.5-59.1 |
57.2 |
|
ND/2019/02 |
CP-KTN-NMS6 |
55.7-62.8 |
55.1 |
Remarks:
[1]: Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of
ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not
applicable to ND/2019/03.
[2],[3]: Since the distance between monitoring
station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The
monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
4.9
All
noise monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting month. One Action
Level exceedance for noise monitoring was recorded due to the documented noise complaints
received for ND/2019/05 and no Limit Level exceedance was recorded in this reporting
month. The summary of exceedance record in reporting month
is shown in Appendix K.
4.10
According
to our field observations, the major noise source identified at the designated
noise monitoring stations in the reporting month are as follows:
Table
4.5 Observation
at Noise Monitoring Stations
Contract
No. |
Monitoring Station |
Location |
Major Noise Source |
ND/2019/06 |
CP-FLN-NMS1 |
Belair
Monte (Existing) |
Road
Traffic at Ma Sik Road, excavator, other
construction site |
ND/2019/05 |
CP-FLN-NMS2[1] |
Scattered Village House in Tong
Hang (Existing) |
Road Traffic near Tong Hang, other construction
site |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS2[2] |
Residential Buildings at Ma Tso
Lung (Existing) |
Road
Traffic near Ma Tso Lung |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS3[3] |
Fung Kong Garden (Existing) |
Road Traffic near Fung Kong Garden |
ND/2019/01 |
CP-KTN-NMS5 |
N/A |
Traffic
noise from railway, other construction site |
ND/2019/02 |
CP-KTN-NMS6 |
Ho Sheung Heung, Hau Ku Shek Ancestral Hall, Hung Shing
Temple & Pai Fung Temple and Sin
Wai Nunnery (Existing) |
Road Traffic near Ho Sheung
Heung, forklift |
Remarks:
[1]: Since the distance between monitoring station and site boundary of
ND/2019/03 under EP-473/2013/A exceeds 300m. The monitoring station is not
applicable to ND/2019/03.
[2],[3]: Since the distance between monitoring
station and site boundary of ND/2019/03 under EP-468/2013/A exceeds 300m. The
monitoring station is not applicable to ND/2019/03.
4.11
Should
any project related non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance
with the Action Plan in Appendix J
shall be carried out.