8.1
In accordance with the updated EM&A
Manual, baseline condition survey and baseline vibration impact assessment shall
be conducted for identified built heritage prior to the commencement of
construction works. Baseline condition survey and baseline vibration impact
assessment shall be conducted by a qualified building surveyor or qualified
structural engineer to define the vibration limit (a vibration limit at 7.5mm/s
and 15mm/s could be adopted for graded historical buildings and historical
buildings respectively) and to evaluate if construction vibration monitoring
and structural strengthening measures are required during construction phase to
ensure the construction performance meets the vibration standard stated in the
EIA report.
8.2
According to the condition survey report from
cultural heritage condition survey for Castle Peak Road Diversion under
EP-466/2013/A, Kwu Tung
North New Development Area Road D1 to D5 under EP-468/2013/A, and Fanling Bypass Eastern Section under EP-473/2013/A, a vibration
monitoring plan was proposed for the surveyed cultural heritage based on the
Buildings Department¡¦s Practice Note (PNAP) APP-137.
This section presents the results of built heritage monitoring performed by the
Contractor according to the proposed monitoring plan in baseline condition
survey report. Appendix B shows the
Limit Levels for the monitoring works.
8.3
In the reporting month, no construction
vibration monitoring was conducted
for built heritage when no pile driving operation was conducted within
assessment area of the construction works. The location of the construction vibration
monitoring stations was summarised in Table 8.1 and shown in Appendix K.
Table 8.1 Location
of Construction Vibration Monitoring
EP. No |
Contract No. |
Monitoring
Station (s) |
Nature
of Cultural Heritage |
Location
(s) |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
Monitoring Parameters and Frequency
8.4
Table 8.2 summarises the vibration
monitoring plan for surveyed cultural heritage under the Works Contracts.
Vibration monitoring was conducted for surveyed built heritage when pile
driving operation was conducted within the assessment area of construction works.
Table
8.2 Vibration Monitoring Plan
EP. No |
Contract No. |
Monitoring
Stations |
Distance
with Construction Works |
Monitoring
Plan |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
Within 50m |
Daily assessment is required |
Within 75m |
Bi-daily assessment is required |
|||
Within 100m |
Weekly assessment is required |
Remark:
[1] Baseline condition survey was conducted
for built heritage features at G202, G203, G303, G308, HKT03 and KT57 under EP-468/2013/A,
also HFL08, FL05, FL07, FL08, FL10, FL11, FL17, FL19, FL31 and FL33 under
ND/2019/04, and HFL05, FL02, FL04, FL24, FL27 and FL36 under ND/2019/05 for
EP-473/2013/A. As G202, G203, G303, G308, HKT03, KT57, HFL05, HFL08, FL02,
FL04, FL05, FL07, FL08, FL10, FL11, FL17, FL19, FL24, FL27, FL31, FL33 and FL36
were not within the assessment area of the related construction work, no
construction vibration monitoring was conducted for the built heritage in the
reporting month.
8.5
The construction vibration monitoring is
planned to be conducted throughout each event of the pile driving operation on a daily basis. The effect of ground-borne vibration from
piling works on the surveyed built heritage was assessed by the maximum peak
particle velocity (ppv), which was obtained from the
maximum value of measurement of all pile driving operation events.
8.6
No copies of calibration certificates of the
monitoring equipment employed by the Contractor of the
construction vibration monitoring are attached in Appendix C since no
vibration monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.
8.7
In the reporting month, no construction
vibration monitoring was carried out by the Contractor for the built heritage
features when no pile driving operation was conducted within 50m of the construction
work. No Limit Level exceedance for construction vibration monitoring was
recorded in the reporting month. The monitoring results, if any, are provided
in Appendix K.
8.8
Table 8.3 summarises the
vibration limits for construction vibration monitoring for surveyed cultural heritage.
Table 8.3 Vibration
Limits for Construction Vibration Monitoring
Type of Building |
Guide Values of Maximum ppv*
(mm/Sec) |
|
Transient Vibration |
Continuous Vibration |
|
Vibration-sensitive / dilapidated
buildings# |
7.5 |
3.0 |
Declared
monuments/ Historical structures |
3.0 |
Remarks:
* peak particle velocity
# as cultural
heritages are sensitive receivers, vibration monitoring should be classified as
vibration-sensitive
8.9
If any exceedance of limits is found or damage
to either structural or non-structural elements of the historic buildings is identified,
the construction works should be stopped immediately and structural engineer¡¦s advices should be sought for any remedial work.