8.1
In
accordance with the updated EM&A Manual, baseline condition survey and baseline
vibration impact assessment shall be conducted for identified built heritage
prior to the commencement of construction works. Baseline condition survey and
baseline vibration impact assessment shall be conducted by a qualified building
surveyor or qualified structural engineer to define the vibration limit (a
vibration limit at 7.5mm/s and 15mm/s could be adopted for graded historical
buildings and historical buildings respectively) and to evaluate if
construction vibration monitoring and structural strengthening measures are
required during construction phase to ensure the construction performance meets
the vibration standard stated in the EIA report.
8.2
According
to the condition survey report from cultural heritage condition survey for Castle
Peak Road Diversion under EP-466/2013/A, Kwu Tung
North New Development Area Road D1 to D5 under EP-468/2013/A, and Fanling
Bypass Eastern Section under EP-473/2013/A, a
vibration monitoring plan was proposed for the surveyed cultural heritage based
on the Buildings Department’s Practice Note (PNAP) APP-137. This section presents the
results of built heritage monitoring performed by the Contractor according to
the proposed monitoring plan in baseline condition survey report. Appendix B shows the Limit Levels for
the monitoring works.
8.3
In
the reporting month, no construction vibration monitoring was conducted for built heritage when no pile driving operation
was conducted within assessment area of the construction works. The location of
the construction vibration monitoring stations was summarised
in Table 8.1 and shown in Appendix K.
Table 8.1 Location of Construction Vibration
Monitoring
|
EP. No |
Contract No. |
Monitoring Station (s) |
Nature of Cultural Heritage |
Location (s) |
|
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
Monitoring Parameters and Frequency
8.4
Table 8.2 summarises
the vibration monitoring plan for surveyed cultural heritage under the Works
Contracts. Vibration monitoring was conducted for surveyed built heritage when
pile driving operation was conducted within the assessment
area of construction works.
Table 8.2 Vibration
Monitoring Plan
|
EP. No |
Contract No. |
Monitoring Stations |
Distance with Construction Works |
Monitoring Plan |
|
NIL |
NIL |
NIL |
Within 50m |
Daily assessment is required |
|
Within 75m |
Bi-daily assessment is required |
|||
|
Within 100m |
Weekly assessment is required |
Remark:
[1] Baseline condition survey was conducted for built
heritage features at G202, G203, G303, G308, HKT03 and KT57 under
EP-468/2013/A, also HFL08, FL05, FL07, FL08, FL10, FL11, FL17, FL19, FL31 and
FL33 under ND/2019/04, and HFL05, FL02, FL04, FL24, FL27 and FL36 under
ND/2019/05 for EP-473/2013/A. As G202, G203, G303, G308, HKT03, KT57, HFL05, HFL08,
FL02, FL04, FL05, FL07, FL08, FL10, FL11, FL17, FL19, FL24, FL27, FL31, FL33 and
FL36 were not within the assessment area of the related construction work, no
construction vibration monitoring was conducted for the built heritage in the
reporting month.
8.5
The
construction vibration monitoring is planned to be conducted throughout each
event of the pile driving operation on a daily basis.
The effect of ground-borne vibration from piling works on the surveyed built
heritage was assessed by the maximum peak particle velocity (ppv), which was obtained from the maximum value of
measurement of all pile driving operation events.
8.6
No copies of calibration certificates
of the monitoring equipment employed by the Contractor of the construction vibration
monitoring are attached in Appendix C since no vibration was conducted in the
reporting month.
8.7
In
the reporting month, no construction vibration monitoring was carried out by
the Contractor for the built heritage features when no pile driving operation was
conducted within 50m of the construction work. No Limit Level
exceedance for construction vibration monitoring was recorded in the reporting
month. The monitoring results are provided in Appendix K.
8.8
Table 8.3 summarises
the vibration limits for construction vibration monitoring for surveyed cultural
heritage.
Table 8.3 Vibration Limits for
Construction Vibration Monitoring
|
Type of Building |
Guide Values of Maximum ppv*
(mm/Sec) |
|
|
Transient Vibration |
Continuous Vibration |
|
|
Vibration-sensitive
/ dilapidated buildings# |
7.5 |
3.0 |
|
Declared monuments/ Historical structures |
3.0 |
|
Remarks:
* peak
particle velocity
# as cultural heritages are
sensitive receivers, vibration monitoring should be classified as vibration-sensitive
8.9
If
any exceedance of limits is found or damage to either structural
or non-structural elements of the historic buildings is identified, the construction works
should be stopped
immediately and structural engineer’s advices should be sought for
any remedial work.