Monitoring of Measures to Minimise
Disturbance to Water Birds in Ng Tung River, Sheung Yue River, Shek Sheung River and Long Valley
Monitoring
Requirements and Protocol
4
5
6
7
8
9
9.1
As
required under Section 12.3.2.5 of Updated EM&A Manual, where development
under the NDAs project is undertaken within 200m (the maximum distance at which
it is predicted there may be some disturbance, and hence a reduction in
numbers, of large waterbirds) of Sheung Yue River and Long Valley, weekly
transect at both high and low tides should be followed (It is considered high
tide when the tidal levels are above 1.5m and low tide when the tidal levels
are below 1.5m at Tsim Bei Tsui
Station).
9.2
The
purpose of the survey was to identify and enumerate all bird species utilizing
the river channels and Long Valley Nature Park (LVNP) and identify any sources
of actual or potential disturbance to birds due to construction activities
throughout the construction period according to Methodology specified in Table
12.1 in Updated EM&A Manual.
9.3
Monitoring
in Long Valley should follow the methodology adopted by the regular HKBWS bird
monitoring programme in order to obtain comparable
results and complete coverage of the area in the shortest time possible.
Monitoring
Frequency
9.4
High
tide and low tide avifauna monitoring is required to be carried out on weekly
basis.
Additional night-time avifauna
monitoring in Long Valley is required to be carried out twice monthly from September
to April.
|
Date
of avifauna monitoring:
|
6th , 8th
, 11th, 15th, 21st , 22nd , 27th
and 28th October 2021
|
|
Date
of night-time monitoring:
|
15th and 27th October
2021
|
Monitoring
Location
9.5
The
avifauna monitoring was carried out at Ng Tung River, Sheung Yue River and Long
Valley in reporting month according to construction works. The transect routes
in the Reporting Month were as follows:
•
T1. Ng Tung
River
•
T2. Ng Tung
River
•
T3. Sheung Yue
River
• T5. Long Valley
As
the sensitive receivers (large waterbirds) are easily visible, the transect
route will only need to follow one bank of the rivers.
9.6
The location of
Transects T1, T2, T3 and T5 is shown in Figure
9 for reference.
Monitoring
Parameters
9.7
The monitoring
parameters and survey methodology for each transect are described below:
•
Abundance of
birds
•
Types of habitat of which birds in use
•
Notable bird behaviours such as roosting, feeding, nesting and presence
of juveniles
• Birds heard through birdcalls that could not be
located would be marked as “heard”, while birds flying over the survey area
would be marked as “flight”. Species of conservation significance would be
specified.
9.8
Other
information at the time of survey such as weather condition, tidal condition,
tide level and noticeable natural or anthropogenic activities would be
documented.
9.9
For
Avifauna survey, Ornithological nomenclature would make reference to The
Avifauna of Hong Kong (Carey et al.
2001), The Birds of Hong Kong and South China (Viney et al. 2005), and the most recent
updated list from other sources (e.g. Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society).
Monitoring
Result
9.10
In total, 64
species of birds were recorded during the bird surveys within assessment area.
Among the recorded birds, there were 25 species of waterbirds. The detailed
list of waterbirds and all recorded birds are shown in Appendix L1k and L1l respectively.
9.11
Among the four
transects, the transect T5 had a higher species diversity and abundance due to
its diverse habitat types within Long Valley. Species such as Ardeola bacchus and Egretta garzetta were commonly
found roosting and foraging at wetland habitats such as agricultural lands and
shallow water habitats.
9.12
Along the
transect T5 in Long Valley, species with conservation interest such as Himantopus himantopus, which is a passage migrant, and Tringa nebularia which
is a passage migrant and winter visitor, were commonly observed in swallow
water habitat.
9.13
Construction works were observed in T5 in
the reporting month.
9.14
Transect T3 was
conducted along the Sheung Yue River. Bird species such as Ardeola bacchus and Egretta garzetta were commonly
observed feeding and roosting on the river bank and river bed. Construction
works were observed beside Sheung Yue River.
9.15
Transect T1 and
T2 are located at Ng Tung River. Ardeola bacchus and Egretta garzetta were commonly found feeding and roosting along
the Ng Tung River. Fishing activities were observed at both T1 and T2, while
construction activities were observed beside T2 during the avifauna monitoring.
9.16
Avifauna
monitoring in construction phase was conducted during the reporting month and
the detailed results are attached in Appendix
L1.
Monitoring of
Measures to Minimise Impacts to Ma Tso Lung Stream and Siu Hang San Tsuen
Stream, and Long Valley
Monitoring
Requirements and Protocol
9.17 As required under Section 12.3.2.14
of Updated EM&A Manual, aquatic faunal monitoring should be carried out
during the construction phase.
9.18 Larger organisms such as fish should
be monitored by direct counting, while kick-netting and sweep-netting should be
used for invertebrate sampling. There should be three replicates for
invertebrate sampling at each sampling point. For kick-netting, the net should
be placed with the opening facing the water current, and the substrate should
be disturbed by kicking to dislodge organisms from the stream bed.
Sweep-netting should be conducted when kick-netting is not feasible, such as in
area with no water current. Small organisms that could not be identified with
naked eye should be brought to the laboratory for identification under the
dissecting microscope.
Monitoring
Frequency
9.19 Quantitative aquatic fauna replicate
surveys of stream fauna is required to be carried out
on monthly basis during wet season. Three replicates for invertebrates sampling
and direct counting of fish fauna should be performed respectively.
Date of aquatic fauna monitoring: 26th October 2021
Monitoring
Location
9.20
During
wet season, the monitoring location required to be carried out in Ma Tso Lung
Stream according to construction works are as follow:
|
•
MS_01
|
•
MS_02
|
•
MS_03
|
•
MS_04
|
•
MS_05
|
|
•
MS_06
|
•
MS_07
|
•
MS_08
|
•
MS_09
|
•
MS_10
|
|
•
MS_11
|
•
MS_12
|
•
MS_13
|
•
MS_14
|
•
MS_15
|
9.21 The
location of Monitoring Stations
shown in Figure 10 for reference.
Monitoring
Parameters
9.22
The
monitoring parameters and survey methodology for each monitoring station are
described below:
•
Species
composition
•
Abundance
•
Distribution
for invertebrates and fish fauna
•
Species of
conservation significance would be specified
9.23 Other information at the time of
survey such as weather condition and noticeable natural or anthropogenic
activities would be recorded.
Monitoring
Status
9.24 In the survey of aquatic fauna, a total of 14
aquatic invertebrate species were recorded in Ma Tso Lung Stream and Siu Hang
San Tsuen Stream. There were 4 fish species recorded in the reporting month. No species of
conservation importance was recorded.
9.25 For the monitoring on 26th
October 2021, the two monitoring stations, MS_01 & MS_05, were found to be
dried-up. No aquatic invertebrate nor fish species were recorded in those
stations as a result.
9.26
Aquatic
faunal monitoring in construction phase was conducted during the reporting
month and the results are attached in Appendix
L2 to L3
Monitoring of Measures to Minimise
Impacts on Ecological Sensitive Habitats from Disturbance and Pollution
Monitoring
Requirements and Protocol
9.27 As required under Section 12.3.2.17
of Updated EM&A Manual, monitoring of measures to minimize impacts should
be carried out during the construction phase.
9.28 The purpose of survey is to monitor
the effectiveness of measures to minimize impacts on ecologically sensitive
habitats from disturbance and pollution by standard faunal transect surveys.
Mammal survey
9.29 Mammal survey should be performed
during both day and night times, in areas along the transect routes which may
potentially be utilized by terrestrial mammals. Field signs such as droppings,
footprints, diggings and burrows left by larger
terrestrial mammals should be observed. Mammals directly observed should be
recorded, and identification should be made as accurate as possible form the
field signs observed.
9.30 Bat survey should be conducted along
the transect routes shortly after sunset, with the use of a bat detector to
record the echolocation calls. The relative abundance of the species
encountered should be estimated with reference to the baseline monitoring results,
i.e. using a scale from one (species recorded within
transect routes) to three (dominant species within transect routes), for
comparison between baseline results and the current monitoring results.
Nomenclature of mammal should be based on Shek (2006).
Herpetofauna survey (Amphibians and
Reptiles)
9.31 Amphibian surveys should be
conducted whenever possible on evenings following or during periods of
rainfall, focusing on areas suitable for amphibians (e.g.
forest, shrublands, grasslands, streams, ponds, marshes, etc.). Calling
amphibians should be recorded, supplemented by visual observation of eggs,
tadpoles, adult frogs, and toads.
9.32 Active searching of appropriate
microhabitats such as stones, pond bunds, crevices and leaf debris should be
performed mainly. Observation of exposed, basking and
foraging reptiles should also be conducted. Nomenclature of amphibian and
reptile should be based on Chan et al. (2005) and Karsen
et al. (1998), respectively.
Insect survey (Butterfly and Dragonfly)
9.33 Butterflies and dragonflies observed
along the transects should be identified and counted. Preferable habitats of
the insects such as watercourses, fishponds, and vegetated areas should be
observed with special attention. Nomenclature and protection status of the species
should be based on Lo et al. (2005) for butterflies and Tam et al. (2011) for
dragonflies
Monitoring
Frequency
9.34
Monitoring
surveys of ecological sensitive receivers such as mammals, insects (butterflies
and dragonflies), and herpetofauna should be undertaken on a monthly
bases.
|
Date of Monitoring
surveys of ecological sensitive receivers:
|
12th , 20th October 2021
|
Monitoring
Location
9.35
The
transect routes in the Reporting Month according to construction works are as
follows:
•
T1. Ma Tso Lung
riparian zone and associated wetland habitats;
•
T1. Green belt
areas E1-8, D1-8 and G1-3 in KTN NDA;
•
T1. AGR one C2-4
and C2-2 in KTN NDA;
•
T1. Area north
of Ng Tung River;
•
T3. Area west of
Siu Hang San Tsuen Stream
•
T4. South side
of Fanling Highway and Castle Peak Road in the
vicinity of Pak Shek Au;
•
T5. Area west
and east of the southern limit of the FLN NDA work area; and
•
T6. Areas in the
western part of KTN
9.36 The location of Transects is shown
in Figure 11 for reference.
Monitoring
Parameters
9.37
The
monitoring parameters and survey methodology for each transect are described below:-
•
Species
composition
•
Abundance
•
Distribution
for fauna observed
•
Species of
conservation significance would be specified
Monitoring
Result
Mammal
9.38
During the
survey, a total of 4 mammal species were recorded from transects T1, T3, T4, T5
and T6. A total of 2 species of conservation importance were recorded, namely bats Pipistrellus abramus and Cynopterus sphinx.
9.39
Domestic cat, Felis catus was
found at T1. Domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, was found at T1, T5 and T6, where
associated with human settlements.
9.40
Echolocation
calls of bats were recorded with a bat detector. The bat detector would list
out possible bat species having similar echolocation calls in pattern and
frequency. The structure of the echolocation calls from the recordings was
later analysed to identify species as far as possible
(the lack of literature on echolocation call structure makes the field
identification of some bat species in Hong Kong difficult, and some species
could only be identified to genus level, or remain unidentified from the
recordings).
9.41
Identification
of bat species encountered in the surveys was made with consideration to the
possible bat species suggested by the bat detector, the distribution of the
suggested bat species in Hong Kong, previous records of bat species in the EIA
Report and Baseline Monitoring Report, and the structure of echolocation calls
of the recordings (including call structure, frequency, duration, inter pulse
interval etc., with reference to relevant literatures).
9.42
Pipistrellus abramus was recorded with FM/QCF call structure and frequency around 45 kHz to
68 kHz (Ma et al., 2010, p.319). The above characteristics were further
compared with data from relevant literatures to confirm the identities.
References were also made to Tong (2016).
9.43
Bat species, Cynopterus sphinx was observed roosting in the
tent-shaped shelter under fronds of Chinese Fan-palm at daytime and also found in flight near area with Chinese Fan-palm at nighttime
during the monitoring at T1. Pipistrellus abramus was
recorded in flight at nighttime at T1.
Herpetofauna (Amphibians and Reptiles)
9.44
Along the transects,
a total of 8 herpetofauna species were observed. No species of conservation
importance were recorded. Species including frogs, toads, lizards and
geckos were recorded near wetland habitats and watercourse. Transect T1 had
higher species diversity and abundance than other transects.
Insects (Butterfly and Dragonfly)
9.45 During the insect survey, a total of 27 butterfly
species and 6 odonata species were recorded from the
transects, with all butterfly species being common or very common except Hypolimnas misippus, species
of butterfly. Transect T5 had higher butterfly species diversity than other
transects.
9.46 All transects except T3 had the same number of
dragonfly species recorded in the reporting month. All of
the dragonfly species recorded, were common and abundant in Hong Kong. Species
of conservation importance, Potamarcha congener (Comment,
Local Concern by Fellows et al. (2002)), was recorded on T5.
9.47 Ecological sensitive receivers such
as mammals, insects (butterflies and dragonflies), and herpetofauna monitoring
in construction phase was conducted during the reporting month and the results
are attached in Appendix L4 to L7.
9.48 For the monitoring conducted on 20th
October 2021 on Transect T5, a section of the transect route was found located
within private property, and was not accessible. Another section on transect T5
was found blocked by new accumulation of fallen trees. The inaccessible part are shown in Photo 1
and Photo 2 below. The adjusted
accessible transect route is shown in Figure
11.
|
|
|
|
Photo
1. Inaccessible part of transect T5 located within private property
|
Photo 2. Imaccessible part of
transect T5 blocked by the fallen trees.
|
Details of the Influencing Factors
Major Activities
9.49
During the survey
of Monitoring of Measures to Minimise Disturbance to
Water Birds in Sheung Yue River and Long Valley, anthropogenic activities
including soil turning with excavator and other construction activities were
observed in Long Valley. Construction works were observed beside Sheung Yue
River.
9.50
The
anthropogenic activities affected only a small area of habitat in Long Valley
during the monitoring and would only pose minor disturbances to the birds. Acridotheres cristatellus
and Bubulcus coromandus were observed foraging near
the excavators.
9.51
During the
survey of Monitoring of Measures to Minimise
Disturbance to Water Birds in Ng Tung River, anthropogenic activities including
construction works beside T2, and recreational fishing by fishing rod at both
T1 and T2 were observed. Remote control speedboats were observed at T1.
Weather Conditions
9.52 According to the observation during
survey, temperature and the rain flow record in the
Reporting Month (Reference: http://www.weather.gov.hk/wxinfo/pastwx/metob202110.htm),
weather condition might pose influence towards the monitoring result.
9.53 Since the Final Baseline Ecological
Monitoring Report has not been issued yet during the Reporting Month, the
Action and Limit Level of ecological monitoring will be compared with the
monitoring results in the Reporting Month and track back exceedance reporting
(if any) after the Final Baseline Ecological Monitoring Report has been issued.
9.54
The
detailed Ecological monitoring results are attached in Appendix L.
Ma, J., Jones, G., Zhu, G. J., & Metzner, W. (2010). Echolocation behaviours
of the Japanese pipistrelle bat Pipistrellus abramus
during foraging flight. Acta Theriologica, 55(4),
315-332.
Tong, C. F. (2016).
Distribution and preference of landscape features and foraging sites of
insectivorous bats in Hong Kong urban parks. (Master dissertation)